US President Donald Trump has sparked fresh debate over the Iran conflict after suggesting that Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth was among the first to advocate military action against Tehran’s nuclear programme – remarks seen by analysts as a subtle shift in political responsibility.
The conflict traces back to the February 28 joint Israel-US airstrikes on Iranian targets, a move that sharply escalated tensions and triggered sustained retaliation from Iran.
Speaking at a public safety roundtable in Memphis on March 23, Trump singled out his defence chief in unusually direct terms. “Pete, I think you were the first one to speak up… you said let’s do it because you can’t let them have a nuclear weapon,” he said, drawing attention across Washington’s political and defence circles.
While Trump described the decision-making process as collaborative, noting consultations with multiple officials, observers say the emphasis on Hegseth’s early role stands out – especially as the war grows more complex and politically sensitive.
War pressure meets election politics
The remarks come as Trump campaigns ahead of crucial midterm elections, with control of Congress at stake for the Republican Party. At the same time, public support for the Iran war has been slipping, amid rising costs, unclear strategic goals and mounting American casualties.
Analysts believe Trump’s comments may reflect an effort to recalibrate political accountability as scrutiny intensifies in Washington.
Since the escalation, Hegseth has been the public face of the military campaign, dubbed “Operation Epic Fury,” repeatedly defending its objectives. “We didn’t start this war, but under President Trump we’re finishing it,” he said earlier, projecting a hardline stance.
However, his messaging has gradually shifted. Early signals hinting at regime change in Iran have given way to a more cautious line, with Hegseth stressing that the conflict is not intended to become an “endless war.”
Narrative shift as conflict drags on
Trump’s latest remarks are being read as part of a broader narrative shift, as expectations of a quick military outcome fade. Iranian resistance and continued retaliation have complicated the battlefield, increasing both military and political pressure on the administration.
Notably, Hegseth did not publicly respond to Trump’s comments during the roundtable. He has consistently maintained that final authority rests with the president, saying Trump “controls the throttle” on major decisions.
Pause signals possible recalibration
The comments also came shortly after Trump announced a five-day pause in planned strikes on Iranian infrastructure – a move widely seen as an attempt to ease domestic pressure and create space for diplomacy.
Known for his deal-driven approach, Trump may now be looking to bring Iran back to the negotiating table, even as the conflict continues – balancing military pressure with the prospect of a negotiated exit.